Comments on: History Channel FTW

By: narnianelf

narnianelf — Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:14:37 +0000

I agree with Clam. Hearing women discuss their pregnancies, birth stories and/or child-rearing troubles is yet another great reminder of why I don’t want kids.

By: Clamcheese

Clamcheese — Sat, 06 Oct 2007 23:18:34 +0000

If sex were a “solo sport”, and there was a female league, I’d watch it.

A contraceptive sponge, what a silly idea. A trip to the maternity ward however, there is an effective contraceptive. It does serve another purpose, it’s a good place to pick up women. You know they put out.

A little know fact, men have two brains. The larger of the two is pre-occupied with things like breathing and learning, but the more dominant of the two is the one responsible for getting aroused. The former could be in a state of sensory deprivation, and any red-blooded male could still get aroused.

By: sloth

sloth — Sat, 06 Oct 2007 02:35:37 +0000

Re: Elf’s post: Men don’t need their brain to get aroused because women are incapable of stimulating a person’s brain anyway.

By: sloth

sloth — Sat, 06 Oct 2007 02:34:39 +0000

Also, we learned that the Jews invented the contraceptive sponge. If we find out that Hitler was anti-birth control…

By: narnianelf

narnianelf — Sat, 06 Oct 2007 02:33:27 +0000

This show is amazing.

For one thing, the narrator just reminded us that “sex is ideally not a solo sport”.

And then, it confirmed what all Cosmo readers know - men are pretty much turned on by anything. I believe the direct quote was something along the lines of “you could cut off anything above a man’s waist and he’d STILL be able to get aroused”.

So true. So true.